Notice of Availability |
| Title Page |
| Executive
Summary |
| |
ES.1. Introduction/Background
ES.2. Summary of Draft EIR/EIS Conclusions: Environmentally Superior
Alternative
ES.3. Proposed Project and Project Objectives
ES.4. Summary of Public Involvement Activities
ES.5. Impacts of the Proposed Project
ES.6. Alternatives to the Proposed Project
ES.7. Comparison of Proposed Project and Retained Alternatives to
Determine Overall Environmentally Superior Alternatives
ES.8. Impact Summary Tables
Fig.
ES-1. Proposed Project with Connected Actions and Future System
Expansions
Fig.
ES-2. Components of New In-Area All-Source and Renewable Generation
Alternatives
Fig.
ES-3. LEAPS Transmission and Generation Alternatives
Fig.
ES-4. Environmentally Superior Northern and Southern Routes
Fig.
ES-5. Imperial Valley Link
Fig. ES-6.
Anza-Borrego Link
Fig. ES-7.
Central Link
Fig.
ES-8. Inland Valley Link
Fig. ES-9.
Coastal Link
Fig.
ES-10. Alternatives Retained
Fig.
ES-11. Alternatives Eliminated
Fig.
ES-12. Imperial Valley Link - Alternatives Retained
Fig.
ES-13. Alternatives Retained in Anza-Borrego Link
Fig. ES-14.
Alternatives Retained in Central Link
Fig.
ES-15. Alternatives Retained in Inland Valley Link
Fig. ES-16.
Alternatives Retained in Coastal Link
Fig. ES-17.
SWPL Alternatives Retained
|
| A. |
Introduction |
| |
A.1. Overview of Proposed
Project
A.2. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Project
A.3. Procurement and Resource Adequacy
A.4. SDG&E's Electric Transmission System
A.5. Renewable Energy in the Imperial Valley
A.6. Agency Use of This Document
A.7. Reader's Guide to This EIR/EIS
A.8. References |
| B. |
Project
Description (3.2MB) |
| |
B.1. Introduction
B.2. Overview of the Proposed Project
B.3. Proposed Project Components
B.4. Construction Activities and Procedures
B.5. Operation and Maintenance
B.6. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
B.7. Applicant Proposed Measures
B.8. References
Fig.
B-1. Proposed Project Overview
Fig.
B-2. Proposed Project Links
Fig. B-3.
Imperial Valley Link
Fig. B-4. Anza-Borrego
Link
Fig. B-4a.
Anza-Borrego ROW History of Surveys
Fig. B-5. Central
Link
Fig. B-6.
Inland Valley Link
Fig. B-7.
Inland Valley Link Detail
Fig. B-8. Coastal
Link
Fig. B-9.
Coastal Link Detail
Fig. B-10.
Other System Upgrades
Fig. B-11.
Sycamore Canyon - Elliot Substation Reconductor
Fig.
B-12a. 230 kV Transmission System Expansion
Fig.
B-12b. Future Transmission System Expansion: 500 kV Central East
to Riverside
Fig. B-13. Typical 500 kV Single-Circuit Lattice Tower: Imperial Valley
and Central Links*
Fig. B-14. Typical 500 kV Single-Circuit Tubular Steel Pole: Imperial
Valley Link*
Fig. B-15. Typical 500 kV Single-Circuit Steel H-Frame Tower: Imperial
Valley and Anza-Borrego Links*
Fig. B-16. Typical 230 kV Double-Circuit Tubular Lattice Tower: Central,
Inland Valley, and Coastal Links*
Fig. B-17. Typical 230 kV Double-Circuit Tubular Steel Pole: Central,
Inland Valley, and Coastal Links*
Fig. B-18. Typical 230 kV Single-Circuit Steel Transition Tower (Cable
Pole): Inland Valley and Coastal Links*
Fig. B-19. Typical 500 kV Single-Circuit Lattice Tower with 69 kV
or 92 kV Underbuild: Anza-Borrego and Central Links*
Fig. B-20. Typical 69 kV Double-Circuit Tubular Steel Pole: Central
Link*
Fig. B-21. Typical 69 kV Single-Circuit Wood Transition Tower (Cable
Pole): Anza-Borrego Link*
Fig. B-22. Typical 69 kV Single-Circuit Steel Transition Tower (Cable
Pole)*
Fig. B-23. Typical 92 kV Single-Circuit Steel Transition Tower (Cable
Pole): Anza-Borrego Link*
Fig. B-24. Typical 230 kV Duct Bank: Inland Valley and Coastal Links
(vertical configuration)*
Fig. B-25. Typical 69 or 92 kV Duct Bank: Anza-Borrego Link*
Fig. B-26.
Typical 230 kV Duct Bank: Coastal Link (horizontal configuration)
Fig. B-27. Typical 69 kV Vault: Anza-Borrego Link*
Fig. B-28. Typical 92 kV Vault: Anza-Borrego Link*
Fig. B-29. Typical 230 kV Vault: Inland Valley and Coastal Links*
Fig.
B-30. Imperial Valley Substation: Proposed Modifications
Fig.
B-31. Central East Substation: 500/230/12 kV Equipment One Line
Diagram
Fig.
B-32. Central East Substation: 500/230 kV Switchyard: General
Arrangement
Fig.
B-33. Central East Substation: 500/230 kV Switchyard: Section
A-A
Fig.
B-34. Central East Substation: 500/230 kV Switchyard: Section
B-B & D-D
Fig.
B-35. Central East Substation: 500/230 kV Switchyard: Section
C-C
Fig.
B-36. Central East Substation: Grading Plan
Fig.
B-37. Central East Substation: Landscape Plan
Fig.
B-38. Sycamore Canyon Substation: Proposed Modifications
Fig. B-39.
Peñasquitos Substation: Proposed Modifications
Fig. B-40.
San Luis Rey Substation: Proposed Modifications
Fig. B-41.
South Bay Substation: Proposed Modifications
Fig.
B-42a. Construction Schedule
Fig.
B-42b. Construction Schedule
Fig.
B-42c. Construction Schedule
Fig.
B-43. Construction Labor
Fig.
B-44a. Connected Actions, SES Solar Two Project and 230 kV Transmission
Line
Fig.
B-44b. Connected Actions, SES Solar Two Project Site
Fig.
B-44c. Connected Actions, SES Solar Two Project Components
Fig.
B-45. Connected Actions, IID Transmission System Upgrades
Fig.
B-46. Connected Actions: Esmeralda-San Felipe Geothermal Project
Fig.
B-47. Connected Actions: Jacumba Substation
Fig.
B-48. Indirect Action: La Rumorosa Wind Project
Fig.
B-49. Indirect Action: Border Region Wind Power
Fig.
B-50. Indirect Action: Views from La Rumorosa |
| C. |
Alternatives |
| |
C.1. Alternatives Development
and Screening Process
C.2. Alternatives Screening Methodology
C.3. Summary of Screening Results
C.4. Alternatives Evaluated in this EIR/EIS
C.5. Alternatives Eliminated from Full EIR/EIS Evaluation
C.6. No Project/No Action Alternative
C.7. References
Fig.
C-1. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Retained
Fig. C-2.
Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Considered
Fig. C-3.
Central Link Alternatives Retained
Fig. C-4.
Inland Valley Link Alternatives Retained
Fig. C-5.
Coastal Link Alternatives Retained
Fig. C-6.
Southwest Powerlink Alternatives Retained
Fig. C-7.
System Alternatives Retained
Fig. C-8.
Components of New In-Area All-Source and Renewable Generation Alternatives
Fig.
C-9. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Eliminated
Fig.
C-10. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Eliminated
Fig. C-11.
Central Link Alternatives Eliminated
Fig.
C-12. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Eliminated
Fig. C-13.
Coastal Link Alternatives Eliminated
Fig. C-14.
SWPL Alternatives Eliminated
Fig. C-15.
System Alternatives Eliminated
Fig. C-16. DG Penetration Projections (Nameplate Capacity)* |
| D.1 |
Introduction
to Environmental Analysis |
| |
D.1.1. Organization of Each
Section
D.1.2. Environmental Assessment Methodology
Fig.
D.1-1. Imperial Valley Link: Alternatives Retained
Fig.
D.1-2. Anza-Borrego Link: Alternatives Retained
Fig.
D.1-3. Santa Ysabel Valley: Alternatives Retained
Fig. D.1-4.
Mesa Grande Alternative
Fig. D.1-5. CNF Existing
69 kV Route Alternative
Fig. D.1-6.
Oak Hollow Road Underground Alternative
Fig. D.1-7.
San Vicente Road Transition Alternative
Fig. D.1-8.
Chuck Wagon Road Alternative
Fig.
D.1-9. Pomerado Road to Miramar Area North Alternative (East)
Fig.
D.1-10. Pomerado Road to Miramar Area North Alternative (West)
Fig. D.1-11.
Los Peñasquitos Canyon Preserve-Mercy Road Alternative
Fig.
D.1-12. Black Mountain to Park Village Road Underground Alternative
Fig.
D.1-13. Coastal Link System Upgrades
Fig.
D.1-14. Top of the World Substation Alternative |
| D.2 |
Biological
Resources |
| |
D.2.1. Regional Setting and
Approach to Data Collection
D.2.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.2.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.2.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.2.5. Vegetation
D.2.6. Jurisdictional Waters and Wetlands
D.2.7. Introduction of Invasive, Non-native, or Noxious Plant Species
D.2.8. Dust
D.2.9. Listed or Sensitive Plant Species
D.2.10. Construction Activities: Disturbance to Wildlife
D.2.11. Listed or Sensitive Wildlife Species
D.2.12. Nesting Birds
D.2.13. Wildlife Corridors, Movement of Fish, and/or Nursery Sites
D.2.14. Bird Electrocution and/or Collision
D.2.15. Increased Predation of Listed and Sensitive Wildlife Species
by Ravens
D.2.16. Maintenance Activities: Disturbance to Wildlife and Wildlife
Mortality
D.2.17. Other System Upgrades
D.2.18. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.2.19. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.2.20. Overall Biological Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.2.21. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.2.22. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.2.23. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.2.24. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.2.25. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.2.26. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.2.27. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.2.28. References
Fig.
D.2-1. Biological Resources Overview: Imperial Valley Link
Fig.
D.2-2. Biological Resources Overview: Anza-Borrego Link
Fig.
D.2-3. Biological Resources Overview: Central Link
Fig.
D.2-4. Biological Resources Overview: Inland Valley Link
Fig.
D.2-5. Biological Resources Overview: Coastal Link
Fig.
D.2-6. Biological Resources Overview: Sycamore Canyon-Elliot Substation
Reconductor
Fig. D.2-7.
Sample Proposed Project Biological Resources/Impacts Map |
| D.3 |
Visual
Resources |
| |
D.3.1. Regional Setting and
Approach to Baseline Analysis
D.3.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.3.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.3.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.3.5. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.3.6. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.3.7. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.3.8. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.3.9. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.3.10. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.3.11. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.3.12. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.3.13. Overall Visual Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.3.14. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.3.15. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.3.16. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.3.17. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.3.18. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.3.19. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.3.20. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.3.21. References
Fig.
D.3-1A. Visual Resources: Imperial Valley Link
Fig.
D.3-1B. Visual Resources: Anza-Borrego Link
Fig. D.3-1C.
Visual Resources: Central Link
Fig.
D.3-1D. Visual Resources: Inland Valley Link
Fig. D.3-1E.
Visual Resources: Coastal Link
Fig.
D.3-2A. Key Viewpoint 1 - Proposed Project - Interstate 8 - Existing
Condition
Fig. D.3-3A/B. Key
Viewpoint 2 - Proposed Project - El Centro Agriculture - Existing
Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-4A/B. Key Viewpoint
3 - Proposed Project - BLM Road 326 - Existing Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-5A/B. Key Viewpoint
4 - Proposed Project - SR78/86 - Existing Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-6A.
Key Viewpoint 5 - Proposed Project - Old Kane Springs Road - Existing
Condition
Fig. D.3-6B.
Key Viewpoint 5B - Proposed Project - Old Kane Springs Road - Simulation
Fig. D.3-7A.
Key Viewpoint 6 - Proposed Project - SR78 The Narrows - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-7B.
Key Viewpoint 6 - Proposed Project - SR78 The Narrows - Simulation
Fig. D.3-8A/B. Key Viewpoint
7 - Proposed Project - Mine Wash Road - Existing Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-9A.
Key Viewpoint 8 - Proposed Project - Kenyon Overlook - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-9B.
Key Viewpoint 8 - Proposed Project - Kenyon Overlook - Simulation
Fig. D.3-10A.
Key Viewpoint 9 - Proposed Project - Cactus Loop Trail - Existing
Condition
Fig. D.3-10B.
Key Viewpoint 9 - Proposed Project - Cactus Loop Trail - Simulation
Fig. D.3-11A.
Key Viewpoint 10 - Proposed Project - Yaqui Well Primitive Camping
Area - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-11B.
Key Viewpoint 10 - Proposed Project - Yaqui Well Primitive Camping
Area - Simulation
Fig. D.3-12A.
Key Viewpoint 11 - Proposed Project - Westbound SR78 - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-12B.
Key Viewpoint 11 - Proposed Project - Westbound SR78 - Simulation
Fig. D.3-13A.
Key Viewpoint 12 - Proposed Project - Grapevine Canyon Road - Existing
Condition
Fig. D.3-13B.
Key Viewpoint 12 - Proposed Project - Grapevine Canyon Road - Simulation
Fig. D.3-14A.
Key Viewpoint 13 - Proposed Project - Upper Grapevine Canyon - Existing
Condition
Fig. D.3-14B.
Key Viewpoint 13 - Proposed Project - Upper Grapevine Canyon - Simulation
Fig. D.3-15A.
Key Viewpoint 14 - Proposed Project - Southbound SR79 - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-15B.
Key Viewpoint 14 - Proposed Project - Southbound SR79 - Simulation
Fig. D.3-16A.
Key Viewpoint 15 - Proposed Project - Mesa Grande Road - Existing
Condition
Fig. D.3-16B.
Key Viewpoint 15 - Proposed Project - Mesa Grande Road - Simulation
Fig. D.3-17A.
Key Viewpoint 16 - Proposed Project - Inaja Monument Park Overlook
- Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-17B.
Key Viewpoint 16 - Proposed Project - Inaja Monument Park Overlook
- Simulation
Fig. D.3-18A/B. Key
Viewpoint 17 - Proposed Project - Westbound SR78 Santa Ysabel - Existing
Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-19A/B. Key
Viewpoint 18 - Proposed Project - BIA Road 51 - Existing Condition
and Simulation
Fig. D.3-20A/B. Key
Viewpoint 19 - Proposed Project - Northbound San Felipe Road - Existing
Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-21A.
Key Viewpoint 20 - Proposed Project - San Vicente Road - Existing
Condition
Fig. D.3-21B.
Key Viewpoint 20 - Proposed Project - San Vicente Road - Simulation
Fig. D.3-22A/B. Key
Viewpoint 21 - Proposed Project - Southbound SR67 - Existing Condition
and Simulation
Fig. D.3-23A/B.
Key Viewpoint 22 - Proposed Project - Cypress Canyon Park Drive -
Existing Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-24A/B. Key
Viewpoint 23 - Proposed Project - Spring Canyon Park - Existing Condition
and Simulation
Fig. D.3-25A.
Key Viewpoint 24 - Proposed Project - Calle De Las Rosas - Existing
Condition
Fig. D.3-25B.
Key Viewpoint 24 - Proposed Project - Calle De Las Rosas - Simulation
Fig.
D.3-25C. Chicarita Substation Cable Pole Relocated per Mitigation
Measure V-27a
Fig. D.3-26.
Key Viewpoint 25 - Proposed Project - The Preserve - Existing Condition
and Simulation
Fig. D.3-27.
Key Viewpoint 26 - Proposed Project - Corte Belleza - Existing Condition
and Simulation
Fig.
D.3-28. Visual Resources Impact Profile for the Proposed Project
Fig. D.3-29.
Key Viewpoint 27 - FTHL Eastern Alternative - Jeffrey Road - Existing
Condition
Fig. D.3-30A/B. Key
Viewpoint 28 - West of Dunaway Alternative - Dunaway Road - Existing
Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-31.
Key Viewpoint 29 - West Main Canal-Huff Road Alternative - Huff Road
- Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-32A.
Key Viewpoint 30 - Partial Underground 230 kV ABDSP SR78 to S2 - San
Felipe Substation - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-32B.
Key Viewpoint 30 - Partial Underground 230 kV ABDSP SR78 to S2 - San
Felipe Substation - Simulation
Fig. D.3-33A/B. Key
Viewpoint 31 - Partial Underground 230 kV ABDSP SR78 to S2 - San Felipe
Road South - Existing View and Simulation
Fig. D.3-34A.
Key Viewpoint 32 - Partial Underground 230 kV ABDSP SR78 to S2 - San
Felipe Road North - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-34B.
Key Viewpoint 32 - Partial Underground 230 kV ABDSP SR78 to S2 - San
Felipe Road North - Visual Simulation
Fig. D.3-35A/B. Key
Viewpoint 33 - Overhead 500 kV ABDSP within Existing ROW - SR78 -
Existing Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-36A/B. Key
Viewpoint 34 - Santa Ysabel Existing Right of Way - SR79 - Existing
Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-37A.
Key Viewpoint 35 - Santa Ysabel Partial Underground Alternative -
Mesa Grande Road - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-37B.
Key Viewpoint 35 - Santa Ysabel Partial Underground Alternative -
Mesa Grande Road - Simulation
Fig. D.3-38A/B. Key
Viewpoint 36 - Mesa Grande Alternative - Mesa Grande Road - Existing
Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-38C.
Key Viewpoint 36 - Mesa Grande Alternative - Mesa Grande Road - Proposed
Project Visual Simulation Comparison
Fig. D.3-39.
Key Viewpoint 37 - Oak Hollow Underground Alternative - Oak Hollow
West Gate - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-40.
Key Viewpoint 38 - San Vicente Road Transition Alternative - San Vicente
Road - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-41.
Key Viewpoint 39 - Pomerado Road to Miramar Area North Alternative
- Rose Garden Court - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-42.
Key Viewpoint 40 - Los Peñasquitos Canyon / Mercy Road Alternative
- Scripps Poway Parkway - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-43A/B. Key
Viewpoint 41 - Top of the World Substation Alternative - Mataguay
Scout Ranch Flag Pole/Fire Ring Area - Existing Condition and Simulation
Fig. D.3-44.
Key Viewpoint 42 - Top of the World Substation Alternative - Mataguay
Scout Reservation Entrance - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-45.
Key Viewpoint 43 - Top of the World Substation Alternative - Henshaw
Overlook - Existing Condition
Fig. D.3-46.
Map of Top of the World Transmission Line Connection Mitigation Route
Visual Resources Appendix:
- VR-1.
Summary of Key Viewpoint Analyses
- VR-2.
Scenic Quality Field Inventory
- VR-3.
Visual Resource Management Classification
- VR-4.
Visual Contrast Rating Data Sheet |
| D.4 |
Land
Use |
| |
D.4.1. Regional Setting and Approach to Data Collection
D.4.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.4.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
D.4.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.4.5. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.4.6. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.4.7. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.4.8. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.4.9. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.4.10. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.4.11. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.4.12. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.4.13. Overall Land Use Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.4.14. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.4.15. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.4.16. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.4.17. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.4.18. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.4.19. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.4.20. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.4.21. References
Land Use Appendix:
- Fig.
D.4-1. Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-2. Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-3. Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-4. Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-5. Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-6. Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-7. Proposed Project and Imperial Valley/Anza-Borrego Link
Alternatives
- Fig.
D.4-8. Proposed Project and Anza-Borrego Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-9. Proposed Project and Anza-Borrego/Central Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.4-10. Proposed Project and Anza-Borrego/Central Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.4-11. Proposed Project and Central Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-12. Proposed Project and Central Link Alternative-
- Fig.
D.4-13. Proposed Project and Central/Inland Valley Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.4-14. Proposed Project and Inland Valley Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-15. Proposed Project and Inland Valley Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-16. Proposed Project and Inland Valley/Coastal Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.4-17. Proposed Project and Coastal Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-18. Proposed Project and Coastal Link Alternative
- Fig.
D.4-19. Proposed Project and Sycamore Canyon-Elliot Substation
Reconductor
|
| D.5 |
Wilderness
and Recreation |
| |
D.5.1. Regional Setting and
Approach to Data Collection
D.5.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.5.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.5.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.5.5. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.5.6. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.5.7. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.5.8. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.5.9. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.5.10. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.5.11. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.5.12. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.5.13. Overall Wilderness and Recreation Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.5.14. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.5.15. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.5.16. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.5.17. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.5.18. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.5.19. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.5.20. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.5.21. References
Fig.
D.5-1. Wilderness and Recreation Areas: Imperial Valley Link
Fig. D.5-2.
Wilderness and Recreation Areas: Anza-Borrego Link
Fig. D.5-3.
Wilderness and Recreation Areas: Central Link
Fig.
D.5-4. San Felipe Hills Wilderness Study Area
Fig.
D.5-5. Wilderness and Recreation Areas: Inland Valley Link
Fig. D.5-6.
Wilderness and Recreation Areas: Coastal Link
Fig.
D.5-7. Wilderness and Recreation Areas: Sycamore Canyon-Eliot
Substation Reconductor
Fig.
D.5-8. Digital Terrain Model/Viewshed Analysis in ABDSP: Proposed
Project
Fig.
D.5-9a. Wilderness and Recreation Areas: Mitigation Measure WR-4b
Modified ROW
Fig. D.5-9b.
Wilderness and Recreation Areas: Mitigation Measure WR-4b Modified
ROW
Fig.
D.5-10. Digital Terrain Model/Viewshed Analysis in ABDSP: Partial
Underground 230 kV ABDSP SR78 to S2
Fig.
D.5-11. Digital Terrain Model/Viewshed Analysis in ABDSP: Overhead
500 kV ABDSP within Existing ROW Alternative
Fig.
D.5-12. Tamarisk Grove Campground |
| D.6 |
Agriculture |
| |
D.6.1. Regional Setting and Approach to Data Collection
D.6.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.6.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.6.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.6.5. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.6.6. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.6.7. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.6.8. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.6.9. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.6.10. Other System Upgrades Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.6.11. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.6.12. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.6.13. Overall Agriculture Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.6.14. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.6.15. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.6.16. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.6.17. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.6.18. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.6.19. Top of the World Substation Alternative
D.6.20. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.6.21. References
Agriculture Appendix:
- Fig.
D.6-1. Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-2.Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-3.Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-4.Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-5.Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-6.Proposed Project and Imperial Valley Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-7. Proposed Project and Imperial Valley/Anza-Borrego Link
Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-8. Proposed Project and Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-9. Proposed Project and Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-10. Proposed Project and Anza-Borrego/Central Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-11. Proposed Project and Central Link Alernatives
- Fig.
D.6-12. Proposed Project and Central Link Alernatives
- Fig.
D.6-13. Proposed Project and Inland Valley Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-14. Proposed Project and Inland Valley Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-15. Proposed Project and Inland Valley Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-16. Proposed Project and Inland Valley/Coastal Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-17. Proposed Project and Coastal Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-18. Proposed Project and Coastal Link Alternatives
- Fig.
D.6-19. Sycamore Canyon-Elliot Substation Reconductor
|
| D.7 |
Cultural
and Paleontological Resources |
| |
Cultural Resources
D.7.1. Approach to Data Collection
Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project - Cultural Resources
D.7.2. Imperial Valley Link
D.7.3. Anza-Borrego Link
D.7.4. Central Link
D.7.5. Inland Valley Link
D.7.6. Coastal Link
D.7.7. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
D.7.8. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project - Cultural Resources
D.7.9. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.10. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.11. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.12. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.13. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.14. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.15. Future Transmission System Expansion - Cultural Resources
D.7.16. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects - Cultural Resources
D.7.17. Overall Impacts of Proposed Project - Cultural Resources
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route - Cultural Resources
D.7.18. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.19. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.20. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.21. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.22. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.23. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
Paleontological Resources - Proposed Route and Northern Alternatives
D.7.24. Regional Setting and Approach to Data Collection
D.7.25. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.7.26. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
D.7.27. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project - Paleontological Resources
D.7.28. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.29. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.30. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.31. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.32. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.33. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.34. Future Transmission System Expansion - Paleontological Resources
D.7.35. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects - Paleontology
D.7.36. Overall Paleontology Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route - Paleontological Resources
D.7.37. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.38. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.39. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.40. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.41. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.7.42. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.7.43. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table - Cultural
and Paleontological Resources
D.7.44. References for Cultural Resources
D.7.45. References for Paleontological Resources |
| D.8 |
Noise |
| |
D.8.1. Regional Setting and
Approach to Data Collection
D.8.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.8.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.8.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.8.5. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.8.6. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.8.7. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.8.8. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.8.9. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.8.10. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.8.11. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.8.12. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.8.13. Overall Noise Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.8.14. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.8.15. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.8.16. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.8.17. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.8.18. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.8.19. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.8.20. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.8.21. References
Fig. D.8-1. Typical Range of Common Sounds Heard in the Environment*
Fig. D.8-2. Noise Levels for Various Land Use Types* |
| D.9 |
Transportation
and Traffic |
| |
D.9.1. Regional Setting and
Approach to Data Collection
D.9.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.9.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.9.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.9.5. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.9.6. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.9.7. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.9.8. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.9.9. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.9.10. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.9.11. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.9.12. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.9.13. Overall Transportation and Traffic Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.9.14. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.9.15. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.9.16. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.9.17. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.9.18. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.9.19. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.9.20. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.9.21. References |
| D.10 |
Public
Health and Safety |
| |
Environmental Contamination
D.10.1. Regional Setting and Approach to Data Collection
D.10.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project - Environmental
Contamination
D.10.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project - Environmental Contamination
D.10.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.10.5. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.10.6. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.10.7. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.10.8. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.10.9. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.10.10. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.10.11. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.10.12. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.10.13. Overall Public Health and Safety Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route - Environmental Contamination
D.10.14. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.10.15. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.10.16. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.10.17. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.10.18. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.10.19. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
Electric and Magnetic Fields and Other Field Related Concerns
D.10.20. EMF in the Proposed Project Area
D.10.21. Scientific Background and Regulations Applicable to EMF
D.10.22. Consideration of Electric and Magnetic Fields
D.10.23. Other Field-Related Public Concerns
D.10.24. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment -
Safety and Non Magnetic Field Electric Power Field Issues
D.10.25. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project and Alternatives - Safety and Non EMF Electric Power Field
Issues
D.10.26. Future Transmission System Expansion - EMF
D.10.27. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects - EMF
D.10.28. Overall Impacts of the Proposed Project - EMF and Field Related
Concerns
D.10.29. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.10.30. References for Contamination
D.10.31. References for EMF |
| D.11 |
Air
Quality |
| |
D.11.1. Regional Setting and
Approach to Data Collection
D.11.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.11.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.11.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.11.5. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.11.6. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.11.7. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.11.8. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.11.9. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.11.10. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.11.11. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.11.12. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.11.13. Overall Air Quality Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.11.14. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.11.15. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.11.16. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.11.17. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.11.18. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.11.19. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.11.20. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.11.21. References
Fig.
D.11-1. Air Quality Management Districts and Class I Areas |
| D.12 |
Water Resources |
| |
D.12.1. Regional Setting and
Approach to Data Collection
D.12.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.12.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.12.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.12.5. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.12.6. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.12.7. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.12.8. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.12.9. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.12.10. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.12.11. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.12.12. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.12.13. Overall Water Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.12.14. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.12.15. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.12.16. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.12.17. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.12.18. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.12.19. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.12.20. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.12.21. References
Figs.
D.12-1 and D.12-2:
- Fig. D.12.1. San Felipe Creek near the Narrows Substation, Anza-Borrego
Link
- Fig. D.12-2. View Across Santa Ysabel River, Inland Valley Link
Fig. D.12-3. Average Monthly Rainfall*
Fig. D.12-4. Anza-Borrego Link Rainfall/Runoff*
Fig. D.12-5. Inland Valley Link Rainfall/Runoff*
Fig. D.12-6. Summer Runoff for Santa Ysabel Creek* |
| D.13 |
Geology,
Mineral Resources, and Soils |
| |
D.13.1. Regional Setting and
Approach to Data Collection
D.13.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.13.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.13.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.13.5. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.13.6. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.13.7. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.13.8. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.13.9. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.13.10. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.13.11. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.13.12. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.13.13. Overall Geology Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.13.14. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.13.15. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.13.16. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.13.17. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.13.18. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.13.19. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.13.20. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.13.21. References
Fig. D.13-1. Geologic Time Scale*
Fig.
D.13-2. Regional Active Faults and Historic Earthquakes
Fig.
D.13-3.. Estimated Peak Ground Accelerations
Fig.
D.13-4. Superstition Hills Fault Crossing
Fig. D.13-5.
Elmore Ranch Fault Crossing
Fig. D.13-6.
San Jacinto Fault Crossing
Fig. D.13-7.
Elsinore Fault Zone Crossing
Fig.
D.13-8. Fault Location Map for Central East Substation
Fig.
D.13-9. Earthquake Valley Fault Zone Crossing
Fig.
D.13-10. Santa Ysabel Alternatives Elsinore Fault Crossing |
D.14 |
Socioeconomics,
Services, and Utilities |
| |
D.14.1. Regional Setting and
Approach to Data Collection
D.14.2. Environmental Setting for the Proposed Project
D.14.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.14.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.14.5. Imperial Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.14.6. Anza-Borrego Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.14.7. Central Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.14.8. Inland Valley Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.14.9. Coastal Link Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.14.10. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.14.11. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.14.12. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.14.13. Overall Socioeconomic Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.14.14. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.14.15. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.14.16. Central Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.14.17. Inland Valley Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.14.18. Coastal Link Alternatives Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.14.19. Top of the World Substation Alternative Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
D.14.20. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.14.21. References |
| D.15 |
Fire and
Fuels Management |
| |
D.15.1. Introduction
D.15.2. Environmental Setting
D.15.3. Applicable Regulations, Plans, and Standards
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for the Proposed
Project
D.15.4. Significance Criteria and Approach to Impact Assessment
D.15.5. Imperial Valley Link and Eastern Anza-Borrego Link
D.15.6. PFS 1 Ranchita Fireshed
D.15.7. PFS 2 San Felipe Fireshed
D.15.8. PFS 3 Santa Ysabel Fireshed
D.15.9. PFS 4 Ramona Fireshed
D.15.10. PFS 5 Poway Fireshed
D.15.11. PFS 6 Peñasquitos Fireshed
D.15.12. Other System Upgrades - Impacts and Mitigation Measures
D.15.13. Future Transmission System Expansion
D.15.14. Connected Actions and Indirect Effects
D.15.15. Overall Fire and Fuels Management Impacts of Proposed Project
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures for Alternatives
Along Proposed Project Route
D.15.16. Imperial Valley Link Alternatives
D.15.17. Anza-Borrego Link Alternatives
D.15.18. Central Link Alternatives
D.15.19. Inland Valley Link Alternatives
D.15.20. Coastal Link Alternatives
D.15.21. Top of the World Substation Alternative
D.15.22. Mitigation Monitoring, Compliance, and Reporting Table
D.15.23. References
Fig.
D.15-1. Regional Fire Hazard Severity Zones
Fig.
D.15-2. 2003 and 2007 San Diego County Fires
Fig.
D.15-3. Sunrise Powerlink Proposed Project and Alternative Firesheds
Fig. D.15-4. Proposed Project Fireshed Wildfire History*
Fig. D.15-5.
PFS-1 Ranchita Fireshed Boundary and Proposed Project and Alternative
Project Routes
Fig. D.15-6. Ranchita Fireshed Wildfire History*
Fig. D.15-7.
PFS-2 San Felipe Fireshed Boundary and Proposed Project and Alternative
Project Routes
Fig. D.15-8. San Felipe Fireshed Wildfire History*
Fig.
D.15-9. PFS-3 Santa Ysabel Fireshed Boundary and Proposed Project
and Alternative Project Routes
Fig. D.15-10. Santa Ysabel Fireshed Wildfire History*
Fig. D.15-11.
PFS-4 Ramona Fireshed Boundary and Proposed Project and Alternative
Project Routes
Fig. D.15-12. Ramona Fireshed Wildfire History*
Fig. D.15-13.
PFS-5 Poway Fireshed Boundary and Proposed Project and Alternative
Project Routes
Fig. D.15-14. Poway Fireshed Wildfire History*
Fig.
D.15-15. PFS-6 Peñasquitos Fireshed Boundary and Proposed
Project and Alternative Project Routes
Fig. D.15-16. Peñasquitos Fireshed Wildfire History*
Fig. D.15-17. CCR Title 14 Section 1254 Minimum Clearances*
Fig.
D.15-18. PFS-1 Ranchita Fireshed Burn Probability Model
Fig.
D.15-19. PFS-1 Ranchita Fireshed Fire Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
D.15-20. PFS-1 Ranchita Fireshed Containment Conflict Model
Fig.
D.15-21. PFS-2 San Felipe Fireshed Burn Probability Model
Fig.
D.15-22. PFS-2 San Felipe Fireshed Fire Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
D.15-23. PFS-2 San Felipe Fireshed Wildfire Containment Conflict
Model
Fig.
D.15-24. PFS-3 Santa Ysabel Fireshed Burn Probability Model
Fig.
D.15-25. PFS-3 Santa Ysabel Fireshed Fire Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
D.15-26. PFS-3 Santa Ysabel Fireshed Wildfire Containment Conflict
Model
Fig.
D.15-27. PFS-4 Ramona Fireshed Burn Probability Model
Fig.
D.15-28. PFS-4 Ramona Fireshed Fire Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
D.15-29. PFS-4 Ramona Fireshed Wildfire Containment Conflict Model
Fig.
D.15-30. PFS-5 Poway Fireshed Burn Probability Model
Fig.
D.15-31. PFS-5 Poway Fireshed Fire Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
D.15-32. PFS-5 Poway Fireshed Wildfire Containment Conflict Model
Fig.
D.15-33. PFS-6 Peñasquitos Fireshed Burn Probability Model
Fig.
D.15-34. PFS-6 Peñasquitos Fireshed Fire Behavior Trend
Model
Fig.
D.15-35. PFS-6 Peñasquitos Fireshed Wildfire Containment
Conflict Model
Fig.
D.15-36. Ranchita Partial Underground ABDSP SR78 to S2 Alternative
Burn Probability Model
Fig.
D.15-37. Ranchita Partial Underground ABDSP SR78 to S2 Alternative
Overhead Portion Fire Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
D.15-38. Ranchita Partial Underground ABDSP SR78 to S2 Alternative
Wildfire Containment Conflict Model
Fig.
D.15-39. Santa Ysabel Existing ROW Alternative Burn Probability
Model
Fig.
D.15-40. Santa Ysabel Existing ROW Alternative Fire Behavior Trend
Model
Fig.
D.15-41. Santa Ysabel Existing ROW Alternative Wildfire Containment
Conflict Model
Fig.
D.15-42. Mesa Grande Alternative Fire Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
D.15-43. Chuck Wagon Road Alternative Burn Probability Model
Fig.
D.15-44. Chuck Wagon Road Alternative Fire Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
D.15-45. Chuck Wagon Road Alternative Wildfire Containment Conflict
Model
Fig.
D.15-46. Pomerado Road to Miramar Area North Alternative Burn
Probability Model
Fig.
D.15-47. Pomerado Road to Miramar Area North Alternative Fire
Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
D.15-48. Pomerado Road to Miramar Area North Alternative Wildfire
Containment Conflict Model
Fig.
D.15-49. Los Peñasquitos Canyon Preserve-Mercy Road Alternative
Burn Probability Model
Fig.
D.15-50. Top of the World Substation Alternative Burn Probability
Model
Fig.
D.15-51. Top of the World Substation Alternative Fire Behavior
Trend Model
Fig.
D.15-52. Top of the World Substation Alternative Wildfire Containment
Conflict Model |
| D.16. |
Policy
Consistency |
| |
D.16.1. Introduction
D.16.2. CEQA/NEPA Requirements
D.16.3. Proposed Project and Alternatives Consistency Review
D.16.4. Consistency Determinations |
| D.17 |
Plan
Amendments |
| |
D.17.1.
Federal and State Plan Descriptions
D.17.2. Plan Amendments Resulting from Proposed Project and Alternatives
Fig. D.17-1. BLM Planning Areas and Utility Corridors*
Fig. D.17-2. Cleveland National Forest Land Use Zones*
Fig. D.17-3. Cleveland National Forest Scenic Integrity Objectives* |
| E.1 |
Interstate 8 Alternative |
| |
E.1.1. Description
of the Interstate 8 Alternative
Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
Interstate 8 Alternative Route Options
Forest Service Land Use Zones
Future Transmission System Expansion
E.1.2. Biological Resources
E.1.2.1. Regional Setting for All Southwest Powerlink Alternatives
E.1.2.2. Environmental Setting
E.1.2.3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.2.4. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.2.5. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.2.6. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8 Alternative
E.1.3. Visual Resources
E.1.3.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.3.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.3.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.3.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.3.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8 Alternative
E.1.4. Land Use
E.1.4.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.4.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.4.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.4.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.4.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8 Alternative
E.1.5. Wilderness
and Recreation
E.1.5.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.5.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.5.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.5.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.5.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8 Alternative
E.1.6. Agriculture
E.1.6.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.6.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.6.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.6.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.6.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8 Alternative
E.1.7. Cultural and Paleontological
Resources
Cultural Resources
E.1.7.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.7.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.7.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.7.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.7.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8 Alternative
Paleontological Resources
E.1.7.6. Environmental Setting
E.1.7.7. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.7.8. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.7.9. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.7.10. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8
Alternative
E.1.8. Noise
E.1.8.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.8.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.8.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.8.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.8.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8 Alternative
E.1.9. Transportation and
Traffic
E.1.9.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.9.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.9.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.9.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.9.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8 Alternative
E.1.10. Public Health and Safety
- Environmental Contamination
E.1.10.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.10.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.10.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.10.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.10.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8
Alternative
E.1.11. Air Quality
E.1.11.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.11.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.11.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.11.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.11.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8
Alternative
E.1.12. Water Resources
E.1.12.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.12.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.12.3. Interstate Alternative 8 Substation
E.1.12.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.12.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8
Alternative
E.1.13. Geology, Mineral Resources,
and Soils
E.1.13.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.13.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.13.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.13.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.13.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8
Alternative
E.1.14. Socioeconomics
E.1.14.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.14.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.14.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.14.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.14.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8
Alternative
E.1.15. Fire and
Fuels Management
E.1.15.1. Environmental Setting
E.1.15.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.1.15.3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation
E.1.15.4. Interstate 8 Route Options
E.1.15.5. Future Transmission System Expansion for Interstate 8
Alternative
Fig.
E.1.1-1. SWPL Alternatives
Fig.
E.1.1-2a. Interstate 8 Alternative Detail
Fig.
E.1.1-2b. Interstate 8 Alternative Detail
Fig.
E.1.1-2c. Interstate 8 Alternative Detail
Fig.
E.1.1-2d. Interstate 8 Alternative Detail
Fig.
E.1.1-3. Interstate 8 Alternative Substation Detail
Fig.
E.1.1-4a. Interstate 8 Alternative: Campo North Route Option
Fig.
E.1.1-4b. Interstate 8 Alternative: Buckman Springs Options
Fig.
E.1.1-4c. Interstate 8 Alternative: South Buckman Springs Option
Fig.
E.1.1-4d. Interstate 8 Alternative: Chocolate Canyon Option
Fig.
E.1.1-5. Interstate 8 Alternative: Cleveland National Forest
Land Use Zones
Fig.
E.1.1-6. Future Transmission Systems for SWPL Alternatives
Fig.
E.1.2-1. Biological Resources Overview: Southwest Powerlink
Alternatives
Fig.
E.1.3-1. Visual Resources SWPL Alternatives
Fig. E.1.3-2A/B.
Key Viewpoint 44 - I-8 Alternative - Dunaway Staging Area - Existing
Condition and Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-3A/B.
Key Viewpoint 45 - I-8 Alternative - Yuha Desert I-8 Span - Existing
View and Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-4A.
Key Viewpoint 46 - I-8 Alternative - Plaster City West Staging Area
- Existing View
Fig. E.1.3-4B.
Key Viewpoint 46 - I-8 Alternative - Plaster City West Staging Area
- Visual Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-5A.
Key Viewpoint 47 - I-8 Alternative - Sugarloaf Mountain / I-8 -
Existing View
Fig. E.1.3-5B.
Key Viewpoint 47 - I-8 Alternative - Sugarloaf Mountain / I-8 -
Visual Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-6A/B.
Key Viewpoint 48 - I-8 Alternative - South of Table Mountain - Existing
View and Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-7A.
Key Viewpoint 49 - I-8 Alternative - Jacumba - Existing View
Fig. E.1.3-7B.
Key Viewpoint 49 - I-8 Alternative - Jacumba - Visual Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-8A.
Key Viewpoint 50 - I-8 Alternative - La Posta - Existing View
Fig. E.1.3-8B.
Key Viewpoint 50 - I-8 Alternative - La Posta - Visual Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-9A.
Key Viewpoint 51 - I-8 Alternative - Cottonwood Valley - Existing
View
Fig. E.1.3-9B.
Key Viewpoint 51 - I-8 Alternative - Cottonwood Valley - Visual
Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-10A.
Key Viewpoint 52 - I-8 Alternative - Interstate 8 Span - Existing
View
Fig. E.1.3-10B.
Key Viewpoint 52 - I-8 Alternative - Interstate 8 Span - Visual
Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-11A.
Key Viewpoint 53 - I-8 Alternative - Alpine Road Transition Structure
- Existing View
Fig. E.1.3-11B.
Key Viewpoint 53 - I-8 Alternative - Alpine Road Transition Structure
- Visual Simulation
Fig.
E.1.3-11C. Reroute per Mitigation Measure V-66a
Fig. E.1.3-12A.
Key Viewpoint 54 - I-8 Alternative - El Monte County Park - Existing
View
Fig. E.1.3-12B.
Key Viewpoint 54 - I-8 Alternative - El Monte County Park - Visual
Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-13A.
Key Viewpoint 55 - I-8 Alternative - Moreno Boulevard - Existing
View
Fig. E.1.3-13B.
Key Viewpoint 55 - I-8 Alternative - Moreno Boulevard - Visual Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-14A.
Buckman Springs Road - West Buckman Springs Alt. Existing View
Fig. E.1.3-14B.
Buckman Springs Road - West Buckman Springs Alt. Simulation
Fig.
E.1.3-14C. Buckman Springs Alternative Reroute per Mitigation
Measure V-69a
Fig. E.1.3-15A.
Key Viewpoint 57 - Buckman Springs Underground Option - Buckman
Springs Road Northbound I-8 On-Ramp - Existing View
Fig. E.1.3-15B.
Key Viewpoint 57 - Buckman Springs Underground Option - Buckman
Springs Road Northbound I-8 On-Ramp - Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-16A/B.
Key Viewpoint 58 - Campo North Option - Eastbound I-8 - Existing
View and Simulation
Fig. E.1.3-17A.
Key Viewpoint 59 - South Buckman Springs Option - Cameron Truck
Trail - Existing View
Fig. E.1.3-17B.
Key Viewpoint 59 - South Buckman Springs Option - Cameron Truck
Trail - Visual Simulation
Fig.
E.1.3-17C. South Buckman Springs Option Mitigation Reroute Map
Visual Appendix:
- VR-1:
Summary of Key Viewpoint Analyses
- VR-4:
Visual Contrast Rating Data Sheet
Land Use Appendix:
- Fig.
E.1.4-1. Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.4-2.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.4-3.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.4-4.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.4-5.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.4-6.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.4-7.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.4-8.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.4-9.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.4-10.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.4-11.
Interstate 8 Alternative
Fig.
E.1.5-1. Wilderness and Recreation Areas: Southwest Powerlink
Alternatives
Agriculture Appendix:
- Fig.
E.1.6-1. Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.6-2.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.6-3.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.6-4.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.6-5.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.6-6.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.6-7.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.6-8.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.6-9.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.6-10.
Interstate 8 Alternative
- Fig. E.1.6-11.
Interstate 8 Alternative
Fig. E.1.13-A. SWPL Tower in Mine Area*
Fig. E.1.13-1.
Yuha Wells Fault Crossing and Elsinore Fault Zone Vicinity
Fig. E.1.15-1. Interstate Alternative Overview Map*
Fig. E.1.15-2. Reported 13-Year Wildfire Ignition History in Boulevard
Fireshed*
Fig. E.1.15-3. Boulevard Fireshed 50-year Wildfire History*
Fig. E.1.15-4. Reported 13-Year Wildfire Ignition History in Alternative
Route La Posta Fireshed*
Fig. E.1.15-5. La Posta Fireshed 50-year Wildfire History*
Fig. E.1.15-6. Reported 13-Year Wildfire Ignition History in Alternative
Route Guatay Fireshed*
Fig. E.1.15-7. Guatay Fireshed 50-year Wildfire History*
Fig. E.1.15-8. Reported 13-Year Wildfire Ignition History in Alternative
Route Boulder Creek Fireshed*
Fig. E.1.15-9. Boulder Creek Fireshed 50-year Wildfire History*
Fig. E.1.15-10. Reported 13-Year Wildfire Ignition History in Alternative
Route El Capitan Fireshed*
Fig. E.1.15-11. El Capitan Fireshed 50-year Wildfire History*
Fig.
E.1.15-12. Boulevard Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Burn
Probability Model
Fig.
E.1.15-13. La Posta Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Burn Probability
Model
Fig.
E.1.15-14. Guatay Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Burn Probability
Model
Fig.
E.1.15-15. El Capitan Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Burn
Probability Model
Fig.
E.1.15-16. Boulevard Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Fire
Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
E.1.15-17. La Posta Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Fire Behavior
Trend Model
Fig.
E.1.15-18. Guatay Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Fire Behavior
Trend Model
Fig.
E.1.15-19. El Capitan Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Fire
Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
E.1.15-20. Boulevard Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Wildfire
Containment Conflict Model
Fig.
E.1.15-21. La Posta Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Wildfire
Containment Conflict Model
Fig.
E.1.15-22. Guatay Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Wildfire
Containment Conflict Model
Fig.
E.1.15-23. El Capitan Fireshed Interstate 8 Alternative Wildfire
Containment Conflict Model
Fig.
E.1.15-24. La Posta Fireshed Buckman Springs Underground Option
Burn Probability Model
Fig.
E.1.15-25. La Posta Fireshed West Buckman Springs Option Burn
Probability Model
Fig.
E.1.15-26. La Posta Fireshed West Buckman Springs Option Fire
Behavior Trend Model
Fig.
E.1.15-27. La Posta Fireshed West Buckman Springs Option Wildfire
Containment Conflict Model
|
| E.2 |
BCD Alternative |
| |
E.2.1. Description
of the BCD Alternative
E.2.2. Biological Resources
E.2.2.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.2.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.2.3. BCD South Option
E.2.3. Visual Resources
E.2.3.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.3.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.3.3. BCD South Option
Visual Resources
Appendix:
-
VR-1:
Summary of Key Viewpoint Analyses
- VR-4:
Visual Contrast Rating Data Sheet
E.2.4.
Land Use
E.2.4.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.4.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.4.3. BCD South Option
E.2.5. Wilderness
and Recreation
E.2.5.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.5.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.5.3. BCD South Option
E.2.6. Agriculture
E.2.6.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.6.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.6.3. BCD South Option
E.2.7. Cultural and
Paleontological Resources
Cultural Resources
E.2.7.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.7.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.7.3. BCD South Option
Paleontological Resources
E.2.7.4. Environmental Setting
E.2.7.5. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.7.6. BCD South Option
E.2.8. Noise
E.2.8.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.8.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.8.3. BCD South Option
E.2.9. Transportation and
Traffic
E.2.9.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.9.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.9.3. BCD South Option
E.2.10. Public Health and Safety
- Contamination
E.2.10.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.10.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.10.3. BCD South Option
E.2.11. Air Quality
E.2.11.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.11.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.11.3. BCD South Option
E.2.12. Water Resources
E.2.12.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.12.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.12.3. BCD South Option
E.2.13. Geology, Mineral Resources,
and Soils
E.2.13.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.13.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.13.3. BCD South Option
E.2.14. Socioeconomics
E.2.14.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.14.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.14.3. BCD South Option
E.2.15. Fire and
Fuels Management
E.2.15.1. Environmental Setting
E.2.15.2. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
E.2.15.3. BCD South Option
Fig. E.2.1-1a.
BCD Alternative (east)
Fig. E.2.1-1b.
BCD Alternative (west)
Fig. E.2.1-2.
BCD South Option
Fig. E.2.1-3.
BCD Alternative: Cleveland National Forest Land Use Zones
Fig. E.2.3-1A.
Key Viewpoint 60 - BCD Alternative - McCain Valley Road - Existing
View
Fig. E.2.3-1B.
Key Viewpoint 60 - BCD Alternative - McCain Valley Road - Visual
Simulation
Fig. E.2.3-2A/B.
Key Viewpoint 61 - BCD Alternative - Carrizo Overlook - Existing
View and Simulation
Fig. E.2.3-3A/B.
Key Viewpoint 62 - BCD Alternative - McCain Valley North - Existing
View and Simulation
Fig. E.2.3-4A.
Key Viewpoint 63 - BCD Alternative - Pacific Crest Trail - Existing
View
Fig. E.2.3-4B.
Key Viewpoint 63 - BCD Alternative - Pacific Crest Trail - Visual
Simulation
Fig. E.2.3-5A.
Key Viewpoint 79 - BCD South Option - La Posta Truck Trail - Existing
View
Fig. E.2.3-5B.
Key Viewpoint 79 - BCD South Option - La Posta Truck Trail - Simulation
Land Use Appendix:
- Fig.
E.2.4-1. BCD Alternative
- Fig.
E.2.4-2. BCD
Alternative
- Fig.
E.2.4-3. BCD
Alternative
Agriculture Appendix:
- Fig.
E.2.6-1. BCD
Alternative
- Fig.
E.2.6.2. BCD
Alternative
- Fig.
E.2.6.3. BCD
Alternative
Fig.
E.2.9-1. Mitigation Measure T-10, Mitigation Reroute for BCD
South Option
Fig.
E.2.15-1. BCD Alternative Overview Map
Fig.
E.2.15-2. Boulevard Fireshed BCD Alternative Burn Probability
Model
Fig.
E.2.15-3. La Posta Fireshed BCD Alternative Burn Probability
Model
Fig.
E.2.15-4. Boulevard Fireshed BCD Alternative Fire Behavior Trend
Model
Fig.
E.2.15-5. La Posta Fireshed BCD Alternative Fire Behavior Trend
Model
Fig.
E.2.15-6. Boulevard Fireshed BCD Alternative Wildfire Containment
Conflict Model
Fig.
E.2.15-7. La Posta Fireshed BCD Alternative Wildfire Containment
Conflict Model
Fig.
E.2.15-8. La Posta Fireshed BCD South Option Burn Probability
Model
Fig.
E.2.15-9. La Posta Fireshed BCD South Option Fire Behavior Trend
|
