Home | News Room | News Blog

CPUC News Blog

Director Blog: Commissioners Continue Fight Against Climate Change at First Meeting of 2018

 Permanent link   All Posts

Below is a blog from Edward Randolph, the Director of the CPUC's Energy Division 


The CPUC's January 11, 2018, Voting Meeting was one of the more amazing ones that I have witnessed since joining the CPUC in 2010. There are a number of reasons that make me marvel at the first Voting Meeting of the year, including the long-term importance of some of the actions the Commissioners took, and how groundbreaking in combatting climate change that those actions are. 

First and foremost, the Commissioners voted to close Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. If you had asked me seven years ago if it was likely that any of the existing nuclear plants in California would close down when their licenses expired, I would have said it was highly unlikely that California would be able to replace 4,000 megawatts of carbon-free energy, and that the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station and Diablo Canyon would likely continue to operate long after 2025. Now, not only will California be nuclear free by 2025, we are all fairly confident that the electricity from Diablo Canyon can be replaced with carbon-free resources, thanks, in part, to the CPUC's Integrated Resource Planning. I was disappointed and surprised that some environmental groups choose to be critical of the decision. The groups that are critical say that they are concerned that the CPUC missed an opportunity to commit to clean energy. But they are choosing to ignore the results of the Integrated Resource Planning process, which shows a clear path to replacing Diablo Canyon resources with clean energy.

Second, the Commissioners set up implementation of third-party run energy efficiency programs. This may be viewed as a procedural step for a decision that the CPUC already made, but it is another in a series of steps aimed at reducing uncertainty and increasing creative market-based solutions to the ever challenging energy efficiency milieu. While there are risks around shifting focus to third-party providers, the decision could also result in some sea changes in how energy efficiency works. 

Third, continuing our commitment to helping reduce greenhouse gases in the state and lower customer costs, the Commissioners directed PG&E to solicit bids for clean energy resources to replace three costly fossil fuel plants to meet specific needs in Northern California. What amazes me about this decision is the fact that directing PG&E to look for non-fossil alternatives is even an option. The controversy around this decision was focused on process and not that anyone thought it was impossible to find cost-effective options to replace two fossil fuel peaker plants. It is amazing that it is even possible to suggest that the utility may be able to find storage and other clean resources that are more cost effective than fossil. We have come a long way in clean energy options.

Fourth, the Commissioners approved $555 million in Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) research and development. Organized around three program areas-Applied Research and Development, Technology Demonstration and Deployment, and Market Facilitation-EPIC is an important program that seeks to drive efficient, coordinated investment in new and emerging energy solutions.

Fifth, the Commissioners' decision approving 15 new Transportation Electrification pilot projects, as a precursor to what will likely be quite a few more later in the year, continues the CPUC's cutting edge work in supporting the adoption of a wide range of electric vehicle uses. 

Lastly, the Commissioners' actions to increase registrations under Rule 24 for third-party Demand Response providers to be able to participate in the California Independent System Operator markets will allow for the expansion of Demand Response Auction Mechanism. This is one more step where California has steadily but quietly increased Demand Response efforts over the past 8 years. I used to hear a steady drumbeat that California's Demand Response should be more like the regional transmission organization PJM. I think we are at the point that if we take into account that California has a very different industrial base than PJM; that Californians cannot use diesel generators to meet Demand Response requirements; and that we are not seeing Demand Response providers in California switch out their Demand Response to fossil, we see that California is well on the way to being the leader in Demand Response programs.

All in all, the Commissioners actions this month exemplify the CPUC's commitment to fighting climate change with all the resources at our disposal. It signals to the state and the nation that California will meet its climate change goals, and we will do so by being smart, creative, and dedicated.

Edward Randolph joined the CPUC in March 2010 as Director of Governmental Affairs and Senior Policy Advisor. He was named Energy Division Director in November 2011. 

Read our most recent blog postings in the sidebar at right.

Immigration Guide