Rule 21 Interconnection
Electric Rule 21 is a tariff that describes the interconnection, operating and metering requirements for generation facilities to be connected to a utility’s distribution system. The tariff provides customers wishing to install generating or storage facilities on their premises with access to the electric grid while protecting the safety and reliability of the distribution and transmission systems at the local and system levels.
Each investor-owned utility is responsible for administration of Rule 21 in its service territory and maintains its own version of the rule:
|PG&E||Rule 21 Tariff||Rule 21 Website|
|SCE||Rule 21 Tariff||Rule 21 Website|
|SDG&E||Rule 21 Tariff||Rule 21 Website|
Table of Contents:
- Interconnection Rulemaking (R.17-07-007)
- Interconnection Discussion Forum
- Dispute Resolution
- Smart Inverters
- Interconnection Data Reporting
- D.16-06-052 Implementation
- Rule 21 Applicability, Provisions, and History
Interconnection Rulemaking 17-07-007
On July 13, 2017, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Rulemaking to Consider Streamlining Interconnection of Distributed Energy Resources and Improvements to Rule 21. Among the principal topics to be considered in the new rulemaking is the incorporation into Rule 21 of the utilities' Integration Capacity Analysis tools, currently under development in the Distribution Resources Plan proceeding, to inform interconnection siting decisions, streamline the Fast Track process for projects that are proposed below the integration capacity at a particular point on the system, and facilitate interconnection process automation.
Webpage: For information on proceeding scope, schedule, working groups, and history, please visit Energy Division's Interconnection Rulemaking 17-07-007 page. Please visit the Gridworks Working Group Three and Four websites for reports and additional informational https://gridworks.org/initiatives/rule-21-working-group-3/ | https://gridworks.org/initiatives/rule-21-working-group-4/
Interconnection Discussion Forum
The Interconnection Discussion Forum (IDF) provides an informal venue for utilities, developers, and other stakeholders to explore a wide variety of issues related to interconnection practices and policies. The forum, established in Resolution ALJ-347 (approved October 12, 2017), is intended to meet the following objectives:
- Foster proactive, constructive communication between utilities, developers, and other impacted stakeholders about issues related to implementation of Rule 21 and other interconnection rules
- Resolve informally and/or prevent interconnection disputes
- Share information and best practices across utilities and developers
Please refer to the Interconnection Discussion Forum Charter for more information about the scope and structure of the forum. Presentations from previous forums are also available:
- IDF Q1 2022
- IDF Special Edition: Aggregator Agreements (10/19/21)
- IDF Q4-2021
- IDF Q3-2021
- IDF Q2-2021 - Cancelled
- IDF Q1-2021
- IDF Q4-2020
- IDF Q3-2020 - Cancelled
- IDF Q2-2020
- IDF Q1-2020
- IDF Q4-2019
- Past IDFs
Schedule: The forum meets in person quarterly and per Resolution ALJ-347, CPUC Staff has authority to adjust the frequency of the forum as needed. For schedule information, please follow the directions below to join the distribution list.
Distribution List: Energy Division maintains a distribution list for those interested in attending forum meetings. To request to be added to the list, please emial Ix@cpuc.ca.gov.
Section K of Rule 21 describes existing procedures for resolution of interconnection disputes. For disputes regarding missed timelines, please contact the relevant utility’s Rule 21 ombudsman:
For all other disputes, please use the procedures outlined in Section K of Rule 21. For CPUC assistance in reviewing or resolving a dispute, please contact Jimmy Mahady at Jimmy.Mahady@cpuc.ca.gov.
Expedited Interconnection Dispute Resolution Process
On October 12, 2017, the Commission approved Resolution ALJ-347 establishing an Expedited Interconnection Dispute Resolution Process as authorized by Assembly Bill 2861 (Ting, 2016). The expedited dispute resolution process will issue binding determinations to electric distribution grid interconnection disputes based on the recommendations of a technical panel within 60 days of the Commission receiving the Application regarding a particular dispute. For a detailed description of the adopted process, please see Exhibit A of Resolution ALJ-347.
AB 2821 is intended to address the inadequacy of the existing interconnection dispute resolution process described in utility tariffs in Section K of Rule 21, which relies on protracted mediation and does not benefit from readily-leveraged technical expertise to review the engineering determinations and upgrade cost allocations that often lead to disputes.
To apply for the Expedited Interconnection Dispute Resolution process, click here.
For questions about the expedited process, please contact Ix_Dispute@cpuc.ca.gov.
The Smart Inverter Working Group meets on a regular basis to develop recommendations for advanced inverter functionality requirements. For more information on smart inverter deadlines and working group activities, please see Energy Division’s Smart Inverter Working Group page, or contact Jose Aliaga-Caro, Utilities Engineer, at Jose.Aliaga-Caro@cpuc.ca.gov.
Interconnection Data Reporting
Pursuant to Decision (D.) 14-04-003, the three California IOUs submit interconnection data reports to the CPUC Energy Division on a quarterly basis. Public versions of the reports are made available on our Utility Interconnection Data Reports page.
Rule 21 Interconnection Timeline Reporting
On September 30, 2020, in the R.17-07-007 proceeding, the Commission issued Decision D.20-09-035 “Decision Adopting Recommendations from Working Groups Two, Three and Subgroup” in Phase I of the R.17-07-007 Proceeding, which is quasi legislative (definition at 2). The Decision addressed Working Group Issue 12: Improving Timeline Certainty. The Decision states (at 82-83) “The purpose of Issue 12 is to improve certainty regarding timelines for distribution upgrade planning, cost estimation, and construction. In the Working Group Three Report (at 11), parties claim timelines for these three elements of interconnection are not being set, communicated, and/or adhered to in a predictable and consistent manner. These same parties contend that as a result, developers cannot give reliable estimates to customers; customers may be required to carry their own facilities’ loan or leasing costs for longer than reasonable or expected; and Utilities [i.e., PG&E, SCE and SDG&E] are not being held accountable. Working group participants all agree that in order to improve accountability, transparency, communication, and consistency around these times, additional data is needed along with better data collection.”
To address party concerns and improve timeline tracking, D.20-09-035 ordering paragraph 4 ordered the utilities to track “the actual costs associated with the processing of interconnection applications”. D.20-09-035 ordering paragraphs 22-30 address Rule 21 project timeline tracking issues by mandating regular reporting and specifying areas of additional or improved timeline tracking. It is important to note that D.20-09-035 did not mandate reporting for net energy metering (NEM) systems smaller than 30 kVA (i.e., ~30 kW) installed capacity, which, per the March 2021 Rule 21 Interconnection Program Evaluation (overview below on this webpage), represent the majority of the Rule 21 Interconnections in California.
Since in December 2020, CPUC Energy Division Interconnection staff has worked with the Utilities to construct spreadsheets that track Utility interconnection timeline performance for Rule 21 systems as well as interconnection application processing costs. The Utilities serve these spreadsheets to the R.17-07-007 service list quarterly.
Click the link below to download the aggregated version of the latest, cumulative submission:
Columns in the cover page tab of this cumulative submission include information on system location (ZIP), system type (e.g., net energy metering, non-export, etc.), system technology (e.g., solar photovoltaic (PV), battery storage, solar PV paired with battery storage, etc.), and the timeline steps required (D.20-09-035 ordering paragraph and Rule 21 tariff references included for ease of reference). Additional tabs in this spreadsheet capture the actual costs associated with the processing of interconnection applications.
Each Utility also submits its own, more detailed quarterly timeline tracking sheet that accompanies its quarterly submission displayed in the cumulative submission. These more detailed quarterly timeline tracking sheets include dates for each system captured in the all-IOU aggregated coversheet. Click the links below to download the latest versions of the Utility submissions:
If you have additional questions regarding this information, please email Ix@cpuc.ca.gov.
Rule 21 Interconnection Program Evaluation
Assembly Bill 2861 (Ting, 2016) authorized CPUC to evaluate adherence to Rule 21 interconnection timelines. Guidehouse (consultant) carried out the evaluation from May 2019 through July 2020. Stakeholders at CPUC-hosted workshops vetted questionnaires and data requests sent to the utilities and weighed in on report findings. In many cases, utility data was incomplete or unavailable, so Guidehouse used population sampling to evaluate performance. Guidehouse also interviewed utilities and developers, aiming to identify opportunities for programmatic changes to improve adherence to Rule 21, transparency and CPUC / utility feedback mechanisms.
Proposals adopted from Issue 12 in the WG 2/3/V2G AC Decision (D.20-09-035) largely address recommendations 7.1-7.3 from the Report. Ordering Paragraph 22 requires IOUs to track and report 19 interconnection timelines similar to those studied in the report. Ordering Paragraphs 23 and 24 establish standard interconnection construction and metering equipment installation timelines, and Ordering Paragraph 25 requires utilities to notify interconnection customers when they will fail (or will likely fail) to meet specified timeline requirements. Ordering Paragraphs 26-29 hold utilities accountable for tracking and adhering to timelines.
The Report was distributed to the R.17-07-007 and Interconnection Discussion Forum service lists in March 2021 and is available for download here.
Decision 16-06-052 Implementation
Decision 16-06-052 (R.11-09-011), adopted by the Commission on June 23, 2016, institutes a 25% Cost Envelope for interconnection costs; grants Joint Motions pertaining to Cost Certainty and Non-Exporting, Behind-the-Meter Energy Storage; and requires Rule 21 revisions to incorporate the technical requirements for Phase 2 smart inverter communications and Phase 3 advanced inverter functions as recommended by the Smart Inverter Working Group.
For more information about the provisions of D.16-06-052, please visit the D.16-06-052 webpage.
General Information about Rule 21
Rule 21 governs CPUC-jurisdictional interconnections, which include the interconnection of all net energy metering (NEM) facilities, "Non-Export" facilities, and qualifying facilities intending to sell power at avoided cost to the host utility. Rule 21 does not apply to the interconnection of generating or storage facilities intending to participate in wholesale markets overseen by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). These facilities must typically apply for interconnection under the FERC-jurisdictional "Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff" (when connecting to the distribution system) or "CAISO Tariff" (when connecting to the transmission system).
Overview of Tariff Provisions
Rule 21 contains provisions governing many aspects of interconnection, including:
- Procedures and timeframes for reviewing applications
- Fee schedules to process applications and perform impact studies
- Pro forma application and agreement forms
- Allocation of interconnection costs
- Provisions specific to net energy metered facilities
- Technical operating parameters
- Certification and testing criteria
- Technical requirements for inverters
- Metering and monitoring requirements
- Procedures for dispute resolution
The Commission's first iteration of Rule 21 was adopted in 1982. As initially adopted, Rule 21 was designed to meet the needs of small, non-utility-owned generating facilities, namely qualifying facilities, which included renewable, non-renewable, and cogeneration plants as defined by the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act.
The Commission revisited Rule 21 in 1999. Working collaboratively with the California Energy Commission, the Commission undertook a redesign of Rule 21 to establish a more standardized and transparent engineering analysis for the interconnection of distributed generation, especially generation that offsets on-site load. Rule 21 adopted an "Initial Review" screening process designed to permit the utility engineer to quickly identify, among other factors, whether a generating facility is configured to remain within certain technical limits, and thus unlikely to cause electrical disruptions on the grid.
The modified Rule 21 successfully facilitated the interconnection of tens of thousands of net energy metered and non-exporting generation facilities between 1999 and 2011. However, generators seeking to export a portion or all of their generation to the utility's distribution system lacked a straightforward means of interconnecting under Rule 21. Gaps in the tariff also existed for the interconnection of new technologies, such as energy storage.
On September 22, 2011, the Commission opened Rulemaking (R.) 11-09-011 to "address the key policy and technical issues essential to timely, non-discriminatory, cost-effective and transparent interconnection." During the course of that proceeding, the Commission adopted three substantive decisions: Decision (D.) 12-09-018, D.14-12-035 and D.16-06-052.
On September 20, 2012, the Commission issued D.12-09-018, which adopted a settlement agreement focused on the interconnection study process. The settlement agreement required that each utility revise its Rule 21 to assign all interconnection requests to either the "Fast Track" - a screen-based, streamlined review process for net energy metering, non-export, and small exporting facilities - or the "Detailed Study" process for more complicated generating facilities.
On December 18, 2014, the Commission issued D.14-12-035, which adopted revisions to Rule 21 to require "smart" inverters for Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern California Edison Company (SCE), and San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E). D.14-12-035 adopted the revisions recommended by the Smart Inverter Working Group in its January 2014 report "Recommendations for Updating the Technical Requirements for Inverters in Distributed Energy Resources."
On June 23, 2016, the Commission issued D.16-06-052, which enhanced the Rule 21 Pre-Application Report, created a Unit Cost Guide, enhanced the behind-the-meter storage interconnection process, and established a pilot program to institute a cost certainty envelope for interconnections triggering a distribution upgrade.
Despite the significant progress made in R.11-09-011, additional improvements to Rule 21 are needed. On July 13, 2017, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Rulemaking to Consider Streamlining Interconnection of Distributed Energy Resources and Improvements to Rule 21. Among the principal topics to be considered in the new rulemaking (R.17-07-007) is the incorporation into Rule 21 of the utilities' Integration Capacity Analysis (ICA) tools, currently under development in the Distribution Resources Plan (DRP) proceeding (R.14-08-013). The ICA tools use power flow analysis to determine the ability of a circuit to host distributed energy resources. Incorporating the ICA tools into Rule 21 may better inform interconnection siting decisions and further streamline the Fast Track process for certain projects.
For utility-specific interconnection inquires, please contact the relevant utility using the contact information found on the utility's interconnection website.
For inquiries regarding informal interconnection disputes, please contact Ix_Dispute@cpuc.ca.gov.
For inquires regarding smart inverters, please contact Jose Aliaga-Caro, Utilities Engineer, at Jose.Aliaga-Caro@cpuc.ca.gov.For inquires regarding the Interconnection Discussion Forum and all other interconnection-related inquiries, please contact Ix@cpuc.ca.gov.